Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
COR Clearing, LLC v. Calissio Resources Group, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv00317
Plaintiff:
COR Clearing, LLC
Defendant:
Calissio Resources Group, Inc., Adam Carter, Signature Stock Transfer, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Benjamin Riley, Alicja Socha, Steven J Markow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castillo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
Linda Castillo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, Deborah Gilg and Eric H. Holder , Jr.
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv03197
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hayes et al v. Heineman et al.
as 4:2011cv03229
Plaintiff:
Matthew Adams, Eric J. Aho, Jr., Cynthia Alberico and others
Defendant:
Carlos Castillo, Dave Heineman, Shane Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00324
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Rangel et al v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 8:2008cv00469
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Rangel, Robert L. Rangel, Robert L. Rangel and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad and Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ACS State Healthcare v. Heineman et al
as 4:2008cv03021
Plaintiff:
ACS State Healthcare, ACS State Healthcare and ACS State Healthcare
Defendant:
Dave Heineman, Jon Bruning, Carlos Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
