Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,061
Wood v. Clarke et al.
as 1:2023cv01809
Plaintiff: James R. Wood
Defendant: Harold Clarke, Steve Herrick, J.D. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krug v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00678
Plaintiff: Christopher Brian Krug
Defendant: Mr. Harold Clarke, Ms. Beth Cabell, Mr. Kemsy Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00644
Plaintiff: James R. Wood
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke, Mark Amonette, MD, Mr. Dillon, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Bozman et al
as 2:2023cv00632
Plaintiff: Michael Dawson
Defendant: Sergeant Bozman, Lieutenant Allen, Major Lassiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Starks, Jr. v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00633
Plaintiff: Bernard Lee Starks, Jr.
Defendant: Harold Clarke, Kevin McCoy, A. Wethington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00606
Petitioner: Richard A. Patterson
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bartee v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00593
Plaintiff: Steven Bartee
Defendant: Harold W. Clarke and Gloria F. Sivels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Clarke
as 3:2023cv00780
Petitioner: Gary B. Williams
Respondent: Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eason v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv01565
Petitioner: Anthony James Eason
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Bourne
as 3:2023cv00772
Plaintiff: Rodrik Clark
Defendant: R. Bourne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?