Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Coleman-Mitchell v. Connecticut Department of Public Health et al
as 3:2022cv00646
Plaintiff:
Renee Coleman-Mitchell
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Public Health and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Coleman v. Cunningham et al
as 3:2021cv01392
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Coleman
Defendant:
Cunningham, Carlos Nunez and Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Llorens v. Slavin et al
as 3:2021cv01096
Plaintiff:
Michael Llorens
Defendant:
Michael C Slavin, Matthew Mroczko, Donald C Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alejandro v. Quiros et al
as 3:2021cv00542
Defendant:
William J. Longo, Shrimattie D. Maniram, State of Connecticut and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Marrero Alejandro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
Nicole Coleman
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Ettiene-Modeste v. Hartford Police Dept., et al
as 3:2021cv00200
Defendant:
John Builous, II, Hartford Police Dept., Farmington Police Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter M. Ettiene-Modeste and Dexter Ettiene-Modeste, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01588
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Allen Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Carlone v. Lamont et al
as 3:2020cv01288
Defendant:
Chief Court Administrator, David Lehman, Edward M. Lamont and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew S Carlone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Correction et al
as 3:2020cv00300
Defendant:
Jesus Guadarrama, Department of Correction, Campanelli and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
