Cases 1 - 10 of 12
CRENSHAW v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv01557
Petitioner:
CARL CRENSHAW
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRENSHAW v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv01559
Petitioner:
CARL CRENSHAW
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CARR et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP) et al
as 2:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
REED BERRY, BRIAN CARR, MARK CRENSHAW and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION TERRE HAUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SWARTZ v. ANDERSON, CRENSHAW & ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 1:2009cv00786
Plaintiff:
MARCIA SWARTZ, MARCIA SWARTZ and MARCIA SWARTZ
Defendant:
ANDERSON, CRENSHAW & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Crenshaw v. Superintendent
as 3:2009cv00264
Petitioner:
Anthony Crenshaw
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GAST et al v. DRAGON ESP, LTD. et al
as 1:2009cv00465
Plaintiff:
GREG GAST and MARY BETH GAST
Defendant:
DRAGON ESP, LTD., DRAGON ESP, LTD., DRAGON ESP, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HECKEL v. ANDERSON, CRENSHAW & ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 1:2009cv00451
Plaintiff:
CAROL HECKEL
Defendant:
ANDERSON, CRENSHAW & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00291
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
