Cases 21 - 30 of 1,049
Rose v. Falck Mobile Health Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Lisa Deanne Rose
Defendant:
Falck Mobile Health Corp. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Owen v. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
DeAnn Owen
Defendant:
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., Lawrence S. Hershfield, Peter R. Ingram and others
Staples et al v. E&E Co., Ltd.
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Loriann Staples, Ashley Clark and Deann Scott
Defendant:
E&E Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Suhr v. Dietrich et al
as 2:2023cv01697
Plaintiff:
Daniel Suhr
Defendant:
Dean R. Dietrich, Jane Ellen Bucher, Margaret Wrenn Hickey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Evans v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
Deanne Evans
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lichy v. County of Cattaraugus et al
as 6:2023cv06691
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lichy
Defendant:
County of Cattaraugus, Timothy S. Whitscomb, Eric J Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lichy v. County of Cattaraugus et al
as 1:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lichy
Defendant:
County of Cattaraugus, Timothy S. Whitscomb, Eric J Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Coker v. Criswell
as 2:2023cv01100
Plaintiff:
NANCY C COKER and Nancy C. Coker
Defendant:
NFIP Direct and Deanne B. Criswell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
