Cases 1 - 9 of 9
de los Santos v. Service Employees International Union 32BJ, District 615 et al
as 1:2023cv11305
Plaintiff:
Juan de los Santos
Defendant:
Service Employees International Union 32BJ, District 615 and American Arbitration Association
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Guerrero et al v. 100 Percent Delicias Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv10066
Plaintiff:
Yakaira Guerrero, Arabelly Diaz and Yohanna Santos
Defendant:
Carlos Marte doing business as 100% Delicias Restaurant, CIVELIS MARTE De Los Santos doing business as 100% Delicias Restaurant, Derrick Crespo doing business as 100% Delicias Restaurant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10779
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
De Los Santos Diaz v. USA
as 1:2020cv11549
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Wanne Oliver De Los Santos Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
De Los Santos v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (AMTRAK)
as 1:2020cv11103
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp. (AMTRAK)
Plaintiff:
Jose De Los Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lu v. Sprague et al
as 1:2018cv12544
Defendant:
Anthony S. Owens, Kevin P Kerr, Nancy Mahan and others
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
De Los Santos v. Fresenius USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv10620
Plaintiff:
Eleodoro De Los Santos
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. , Fresenius USA Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
