Cases 51 - 60 of 18,444
HENDERSON v. BERNARD et al
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TAVERRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
TERRY E BERNARD and GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITEHEAD v. T E A M LOGISTICS SYSTEMS INC et al
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN MARIE WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
T E A M LOGISTICS SYSTEMS INC and CHRISTIAN EPP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jones et al v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Randy T Jones and Wanda E Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Berry v. Bailey et al
as 5:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Heath Berry
Defendant:
William C Bailey, Robert E (Bud) Cramer, Jim Scanlon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
1816 E. Wood Land Trust, et al v. Buddy Ford
as 24-11282
Plaintiff:
1816 E. WOOD LAND TRUST, ACM TRUST, AEGIS 13TH AVE TRUST and others
Defendant:
BUDDY DWIGHT FORD
Jamieson et al v. Alvaro et al
as 6:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Ian Michael Jamieson and Deidra Janee Wills
Defendant:
Chad K. Alvaro and Christine E. Arendas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fry v. Lonker et al
as 3:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Gerard E. Fry, Jr.
Defendant:
Whitney Lonker and Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Non Performing LLC, et al v. John Tyre, et al
as 24-11240
Plaintiff:
NON PERFORMING LLC and OSLO GROUP LLC
Defendant:
JOHN E. TYRE, a.k.a. John Edwin Tyre II and KAY TYRE, a.k.a. Lanita K. Tyre
Daniels v. Linder et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Darryl C. Daniels
Defendant:
D. Linder, John Robert Houston and E. Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Barriard
as 1:2024cv01726
Plaintiff:
William M. Taylor
Defendant:
Terry E. Barriard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
