Cases 1 - 10 of 1,025
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Gallardo Carrera v. Garland
as 24-2295
Petitioner:
GERRARDO ARTURO GALLARDO CARRERA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
(PC)Bronson v. Gallardo et al
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Duane E. Bronson
Defendant:
Gallardo and Clifton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Gonzalez v. Carmona et al
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Gonzalez, Jr.
Defendant:
Julio Carmona, Peter Torres, Juan Palafox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baird, et al. v. Bonta
as 24-565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK BAIRD and RICHARD GALLARDO
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Villagra et al v. Dentelle, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Villagra, Emmanuel Gallardo, Ricardo Tocay and others
Defendant:
Dentelle, LLC doing business as Gypsea Rose Bistro and Etienne DeYans Yansomwe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Gallardo v. Great Lakes Insurance SE
as 1:2024cv20149
Plaintiff:
Alido Gallardo and Alido Gallardo doing business as LA PAZ HOME CARE
Defendant:
Great Lakes Insurance SE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
