Cases 11 - 20 of 925
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Guillen Izaguirre v. Garland
as 24-620
Petitioner:
GUADALUPE GUILLEN IZAGUIRRE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Tyrece Jefferson v. G. Guillen et al
as 2:2024cv00972
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
K. Guillen and C. Lomeli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Islas v. USA
as 3:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Javier Guillen Islas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
(PC) Jefferson v. Guillen et al
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
K. Guillen and C. Lomeli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GUILLEN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
SANDRA DEE GUILLEN
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM and JOHN DOE(S) I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
GUILLEN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
SANDRA DEE GUILLEN
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM and JOHN DOE(S) I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
United States of America v. Almanza-Guillen
as 24-79
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAFAEL ALMANZA-GUILLEN
Parrish et al v. Shriners Hospitals for Children
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Maria Guillen Parrish and Charlotte Thompson
Defendant:
Shriners Hospitals for Children
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
