Cases 1 - 10 of 8,356
Capps et al v. United Services Automobile Association et al
as 5:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Brian Lynn Capps, Alex Guerrero, Christopher Gutierrez and others
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association, USAA General Indemnity Company, USAA Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gutierrez et al v. Dona Ana County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Raymond Gutierrez, Sabrina Gutierrez, J. G. and others
Defendant:
Dona Ana County Board of Commissioners, Christopher Moreno, David Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Maria Esmeralda Garcia Gutierrez et al v. Karen Lee Martinez et al
as 2:2024cv03486
Plaintiff:
MARIA ESMERALDA GARCIA GUTIERREZ, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to THE ESTATE OF ISAAC VAZQUEZ BARBA, MONICA VAZQUEZ GARCIA, a minor by and through her Guardian ad Litem, MARIA ESMERALDA GARCIA GUTIERREZ, ISSAC VAZQUEZ GARCIA and others
Defendant:
KAREN LEE MARTINEZ, individually and SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE JOHN WILLIAM BOSSETT AND DELORES MARIE FAMILY TRUST and JOHN WILLIAM BOSSETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
RBest Produce Inc. v. Yasa Marketing Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03344
Plaintiff:
RBEST PRODUCE, INC.
Defendant:
YASA MARKETING INC. D/B/A MAZUMA TRADING CO and Jorge Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Morris v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Morris
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin and David Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
