Cases 1 - 10 of 673
Harrison v. Evanston Senior Redevelopment LLP et al
as 1:2024cv03608
Plaintiff:
Eddie Harrison
Defendant:
Evanston Senior Redevelopment LLP and Liliya Tkzcheva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Hardimon v. Thielan et al
as 3:2024cv50157
Plaintiff:
Harrison J Hardimon
Defendant:
Nurse Thielan and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Bailey et al
as 2:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Remo Harrison Daniels and Remo H Daniels
Defendant:
Jerome G Bailey, Sgt Nelson, CO Pach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Livingston v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company et al
as 1:2024cv02959
Plaintiff:
Jean T. Livingston
Defendant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Juan Luciano, Michael Burke and others
Top Metal Buyers Inc. et al v. Lopinot et al
as 3:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Top Metal Buyers Inc., Shelly Branson, Debra Mosby and others
Defendant:
Andrew Lopinot, St. Clair County, Joe Aiello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JARANIN CHAROEN COMPANY LIMITED v. Luciano et al
as 1:2024cv02562
Plaintiff:
JARANIN CHAROEN COMPANY LIMITED
Defendant:
Juan R Luciano, Michael S Burke, Theodore Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
THOMPSON v. HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
MEGAN N. THOMPSON
Defendant:
HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, NICK SMITH, PAUL BICKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willie Harrison v. Christel Crow
as 24-1097
Applicant:
WILLIE J. HARRISON
Respondent:
CHRISTEL CROW, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
