Cases 1 - 10 of 624
Redbird Business Group, et al v. Harrison
as 24-7039
Counter Defendant:
REDBIRD BUSINESS GROUP, LLC, REDBIRD BIOSCIENCE OKLAHOMA, LLC and RB REALTYCO, LLC
Counter Claimant:
MATTHEW HARRISON
Livingston v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company et al
as 1:2024cv02959
Plaintiff:
Jean T. Livingston
Defendant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Juan Luciano, Michael Burke and others
Ramey, et al. v. medQ, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Cheri Ramey and Jana Harrison
Defendant:
medQ, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In re medQ, Inc. Data Breach Litigation
as 4:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Sharon Klepper, Shelby D. Franklin, Cheri Ramey and others
Defendant:
medQ, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Varnes v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Harrison Varnes
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Everett Paul Hailey v. Brett Christian Harrison et al
as 2:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
Everett Paul Hailey
Defendant:
Brett Christian Harrison and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harrison v. Iriarte et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Marco V. Harrison, Jr.
Defendant:
Jesus Iriarte and Twenty4seven Recovery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Harrison v. Owens, et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Marco Harrison
Defendant:
Thomas Owens and Trustmark National Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Harrison v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Christine Harrison
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MICHAEL S. HARRISON, LLC v. BMO BANK N.A.
as 2:2024cv00013
Defendant:
BMO BANK N.A. and BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. HARRISON, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
