Cases 1 - 10 of 52
HOLDERFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07545
Plaintiff:
KYLE HOLDERFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robbin Nelson, et al v. Heather Greene Sharp, et al
as 22-6018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBBIN NELSON, ROBERT A. SHARP, JR. and JERRY WELLS
Defendant / Appellee:
HEATHER ANNE GREENE SHARP, CATHERINE RICE HOLDERFIELD, In her individual capacity as a Judge of the Warren Circuit Court and KY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS
Dugas v. State of TX
as 21-40181
Defendant / Appellee:
McConnell Unit Security, Jose Choppa, Brain Callien and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jarvis Dugas
Holderfield v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01599
Defendant:
Department of the Army, Army Garrison, Fort Belvoir Office Of The Staff Judge Advocate, Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Donna Holderfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Holderfield v. Bymm et al
as 5:2020cv03282
Defendant:
Charles Droegie and Matthew Cade Bymm
Plaintiff:
Caleb Wayne Holderfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLDERFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv61905
Plaintiff:
CRISTY ROBBIN HOLDERFIELD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holderfield v. Saul
as 3:2020cv50112
Defendant:
Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff:
Stacey Holderfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Holderfield v. Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00213
Defendant:
Thyssenkrupp Elevator Corporation and National Geospatial Intelligence Agency
Plaintiff:
Donna Holderfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Holderfield v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00642
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Luther Holderfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
