Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Holderfield v. Bymm et al
as 5:2020cv03282
Defendant:
Charles Droegie and Matthew Cade Bymm
Plaintiff:
Caleb Wayne Holderfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dugas v. The State Of Texas et al
as 2:2019cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Dugas
Defendant:
Municipal of Beeville, University Texas Medical Branch, McConnell Unit Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Hoffman v. Daniel Hall
as 17-7094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY HOFFMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL HALL, HOLDERFIELD and HOLBERT
Hoffman v. Hall et al
as 1:2017cv00765
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hoffman
Defendant:
Daniel Hall, Holderfield and Holbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Duval County Jail et al
as 3:2016cv00224
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Duval County Jail, Chief of Jail, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Brown et al
as 1:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Lawrence
Defendant:
John B. Brown, Brent J. Potter, Catherine R. Holderfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. McConnell et al
as 1:2015cv00010
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Lawrence
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Thomas B. Russell, Steven L. Beshear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Russell et al
as 1:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Lawrence
Defendant:
Thomas B. Russell, John D. Minton, Glenn E. Acree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Strouse v. E. Wilson
as 14-6423
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES STROUSE
Respondent - Appellee:
E. D. WILSON, Warden, BERNARDO, SIS, LAGRONE, SIS and others
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, KEVIN KIDDY, Unit Manager, MENDEZ, SIS and others
Joseph Carlton v. John Rutherford, et al
as 13-13390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH B. CARLTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN RUTHERFORD, Sheriff, JAMES HOLDERFIELD, Director of Corrections and TARA WILDES, Chief of Jail
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
