Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Cierpiot v. Westrock Services, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Lucas Cierpiot
Defendant:
Westrock Services, LLC, Jason Hook and Rex Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Hook v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
Katie Hook
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hook v. Buckner
as 4:2021cv01251
Petitioner:
Robert Lowell Hook
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
M.Y. et al v. Copeland et al
as 4:2021cv00530
Defendant:
Solid Real Estate Group LLC, St. Louis County Gov., Yalima Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Maggie Cotton, Bernard S. Hooks and M.Y.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Cotter Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv01227
Defendant:
DJR Holdings, Inc., St. Louis Airport Authority, A Department of the City of St. Louis, Commonwealth Edison Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Republic Services, Inc., Rock Road Industries, Inc., EverZinc USA Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tamia Banks, Kenneth Niebling, Kendall Lacy and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Cotter Corporation N.S.L.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hook v. Lawson
as 4:2020cv01067
Plaintiff:
Charles A Hook
Defendant:
Teri Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hooks v. Ramey
as 4:2020cv00636
Respondent:
Eileen Ramey
Petitioner:
Terron R. Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hooks v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv02023
Plaintiff:
Larry Hooks
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fittro v. ABS et al
as 6:2019cv03058
Defendant:
Amy Fite, Sheriff Brad Cole, Deputy Hook and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Todd Fittro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooks et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2018cv01897
Plaintiff:
John Marshall, Steven Sanders, Cynthia Luce and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
