Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Saunders v. Dixon et al
as 9:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Courtney J. Saunders
Defendant:
Stacy Dixon, Melissa M. Davis and State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Saunders et al
as 9:2019cv00119
Defendant:
F. Nesmith, C. Fraser, D. Karandy and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders-El et al v. Hehenberger et al
as 1:2015cv08099
Plaintiff:
Antonio J. Saunders-El, Carolyn Blakely-El, Lawrence Walker-El and others
Defendant:
Anna M. Hehenberger, Brian Fischer, A.E. Preston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMaster v. Saunders et al
as 9:2014cv01574
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McMaster
Defendant:
J. Saunders, E. Raimo and J. Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Fischer et al
as 9:2014cv00440
Plaintiff:
Brunce Smith
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, J. Saunders and J. Rosati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pozo v. Annucci et al
as 9:2013cv00754
Plaintiff:
Kevin Pozo
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Brian Fischer, Waninges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Saunders et al
as 12-3459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Victor Perkins
Defendant - Appellee:
J. Saunders, Corrections Officer, J. Serrell, Corrections Officer, M. Brockley, Corrections Officer and others
Somerville v. Saunders et al
as 9:2011cv00556
Plaintiff:
Dionsio Somerville
Defendant:
J. Saunders, Bezio, A. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Saunders et al
as 9:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
Victor Perkins
Defendant:
J. Saunders , J. Serrell , M. Brockley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Eskin
as 10-758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Antonio J. Saunders
Defendant - Appellee:
Monica S. Eskin, David J. Eskin, James M. Parkison and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
