Cases 71 - 80 of 4,452
Stubbs v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv10129
Plaintiff:
Ricardo K. Stubbs
Defendant:
T. Jackson, A. Crawford and C. LaBreck
Chaney et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Defendant:
Holly Harris, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kentucky CVS Pharmacy, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
SJ, et al v. Pontiac, City of et al
as 2:2024cv10111
Plaintiff:
SJ and SE, Lawrence F Jasper, II, Rosalia O Jasper and others
Defendant:
Pontiac, City of, Pontiac Housing Commission, Mungo & Mungo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Adam Jackson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nichols v. Warnecke
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Randy Dean Nichols
Defendant:
John Michael Warnecke, Mathew Ellis, Adam Rummer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jackson v. Thurmond et al
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Marlon R. Jackson
Defendant:
Mark A. Thurmond and J. Corey Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Thurmond et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Marlon R. Jackson
Defendant:
Mark A. Thurmond and J. Corey Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
David McDonald
Defendant:
Karl Jackson and Obion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv02467
Plaintiff:
Taquan Jackson and Taquan L. Jackson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
