Cases 1 - 10 of 17
M. et al v. Azar et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michaela M., Gabriel M., Kinley G. and others
Defendant:
Stephanie M. Azar and Jean W. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Jamison et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00612
Defendant:
Joey Craig and Leroy Jamison
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fortson v. Jamison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00493
Defendant:
David Rogers, J. Thomas, Sgt. Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Fortson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison-Means v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00732
Plaintiff:
Comoletha D'elafaye Jamison-Means
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hallman v. Bibb County Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv01129
Plaintiff:
Bradley Jamison Hallman
Defendant:
Bibb County Correctional Facility, Deborah Toney, Officer Whitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00150
Plaintiff:
Samuel E. Jamison, Sr.
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Anthony (Supervisor) and Union Springs Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Phillips v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00977
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Phillips
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Kim Tobias Thomas , Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chrenko v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00978
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Chrenko
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Leeposey Daniels , C. McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00976
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Griffin
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Kim Tobias Thomas , Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
