Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Jenkins v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Michael Jenkins
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and Gleenover Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parkins v. Staten et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Parkins
Defendant:
Deigarion M Staten, Scott Taylor, Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Jenkins-White et al
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Angela Jenkins-White and Moses Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2023cv00944
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Jenkins and Marshall Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Jackson et al
as 4:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Johnson, T Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Jackson et al
as 2:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, B Johnson, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Graves et al
as 4:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
Brunson Roberts
Defendant:
Solomon Graves, Dexter Payne, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benton v. Ball et al
as 6:2022cv06057
Plaintiff:
Johnny Austin Benton
Defendant:
Todd Ball, Sergeant Gedding, Sergeant Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benton v. Ball et al
as 6:2022cv06047
Plaintiff:
Johnny Austin Benton
Defendant:
Todd Ball, Gedding, Mrs. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benton v. Ball et al
as 4:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Johnny Austin Benton
Defendant:
Todd Ball, Gedding, Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
