Cases 1 - 10 of 23,643
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johnson, et al. v. City of Buhl, et al.
as 1:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Elisha Cimeon Johnson, April Haresco and AJ
Defendant:
City of Buhl and Jeremy Engbaum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. GIGSMART, INC.
as 3:2024cv02521
Plaintiff:
Susan Johnson and Christi McCracken
Defendant:
GIGSMART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act
Corona et al
as 5:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Angela Corona, Elizabeth Campbell, Elizabeth Middleton and others
Defendant:
State Of California, State of California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Tina Dhillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maiki Yamada v. United States Fire Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv03401
Plaintiff:
Maiki Yamada
Defendant:
United States Fire Insurance Company, Crum and Forster Holding Corporation, Cover Genius Insurance Services, LLC a Delaware corporation doing business as Rentalcover.com and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson et al
as 5:2024cv00877
Petitioner:
Lorraine Johnson and Michael Rene Angel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Rupp, et al. v. Bonta
as 24-2583
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RUPP, STEVEN DEMBER, CHERYL JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Johnson v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00743
Petitioner:
Thomas Johnson
Respondent:
James Hill and R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams #218584 v. Otter et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J Williams
Defendant:
N Otter, Unknown Valasco, Unknown Bravo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
