Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 23,684
Johnson v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2779
Plaintiff: CHARLEY JOHNSON, Trustee of the Charley E. Johnson Revocable Living Trust
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and others
P.C. et al v. County of Sonoma et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv02597
Plaintiff: P.C. and M.C.
Defendant: County of Sonoma, Estate of Jacqueline Johnson, Monisha Sashital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B9 MF 1286 W Capitol LLC v. Dewonda Flowers et al
as 2:2024cv03554
Plaintiff: B9 MF 1286 W Capitol LLC
Defendant: Dewonda Flowers, Corrinn Flowers and Ray Johnson
Jones #326158 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00967
Plaintiff: Melanie L Jones
Defendant: Ryan Thornell, Centurion Healthcare, NaphCare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01228
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Cortez v. Stubbs, et al.
as 24-2714
Plaintiff: MOISES JOSUE CORTEZ
Defendant: BRANDON STUBBS, FAC ECF No. 33, JOSE GUZMAN, FAC ECF No. 33, MATTHEW ROMAN and others
Edmiston v. Johnson
as 24-2712
Petitioner: JUSTIN EDMISTON
Respondent: CALVIN JOHNSON
Thinn v. Johnson, et al.
as 24-2673
Petitioner: CLINTON THINN
Respondent: RAYBON JOHNSON, Warden and ROB BONTA
Johnson, et al. v. City of Buhl, et al.
as 1:2024cv00218
Plaintiff: Elisha Cimeon Johnson, April Haresco and AJ
Defendant: City of Buhl and Jeremy Engbaum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Iseli v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv01210
Plaintiff: Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant: William D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?