Cases 1 - 10 of 1,594
Johnson v. Jackson
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
John Ellis Johnson
Defendant:
M Jackson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Liscomb v. Randel et al
as 4:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Liscomb
Defendant:
Kenyen Randel, Antonio D Johnson, Jr, Tod Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koontz v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Morris B Koontz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Demetric Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Johnson et al v. Patel et al
as 1:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
Janice Oakley Johnson, Alfonzo Johnson and Fred Oakley
Defendant:
Darivyak Patel and Hitesh Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Justice v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv02034
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dakota Justice
Defendant:
James Jackson, Gary Edward Johnson, Jimmy Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Johnson et al
as 5:2024mc00022
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard J Johnson
Garnishee:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Thrift v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sean Alan Thrift
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, Tyrone Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gedi et al
as 4:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Keonna Johnson
Defendant:
Muhyadin Gedi and Loadex Ltd Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Woods v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Woods and Demetrius L Woods
Defendant:
Doe, Gary Musslelwhite, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
