Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,338
Felix Jones-Hill v. Catherine Bauman
as 24-1444
Petitioner: FELIX JONES-HILL
Respondent: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Matthew Jones v. Pigeon Forge, TN Police Department
as 24-5485
Plaintiff: MATTHEW JONES
Defendant: PIGEON FORGE, TN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Krista Jones v. Interlake Steamship Company, et al
as 24-1435
Plaintiff: KRISTA JONES
Defendant: INTERLAKE STEAMSHIP COMPANY and MARINE ENGINEERS BENEFICIAL ASSOCIATION, DISTRICT 1 - PCD
Krista Jones v. Interlake Steamship Company, et al
as 24-1432
Plaintiff: KRISTA JONES
Defendant: INTERLAKE STEAMSHIP COMPANY and MARINE ENGINEERS BENEFICIAL ASSOCIATION, DISTRICT 1 - PCD
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff: LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant: LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
Dominick Jones v. Linsia, et al
as 24-1392
Plaintiff: DOMINICK MAURICE JONES
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LINSIA, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GUNWIN, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAKE, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity and others
USA v. James Jones
as 24-5429
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES SAMUEL JONES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5249
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Phillip Jones v. Tim Shoop
as 24-3356
Petitioner: PHILLIP L. JONES
Respondent: TIM SHOOP, Warden
Thomas Baltrusaitis, et al v. UAW, et al
as 24-1356
Plaintiff: THOMAS BALTRUSAITIS, GUILLERMO ANTUNEZ, PATRICK BARTH and others
Defendant: JEROME DURDEN, MICHAEL BROWN, GARY JONES and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?