Cases 31 - 40 of 6,822
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN TYRRELL and ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE ROBINSON, WILLIAM CHARLES VALKEMA, CRESTON JEROME HICKS and others
Simmons v. Genesee, County of et al
as 4:2024cv10815
Defendant:
YesCare Corp, CHS TX, Inc, Genesee, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Kristen Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01430
Plaintiff:
Laketha Jones
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown et al v. County of Wayne et al
as 2:2024cv10779
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Brown, Tianna Hubbard, Rozia Robertson and others
Defendant:
County of Wayne and Officer Terri Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. The American Bottling Company
as 2:2024cv02195
Plaintiff:
Reco Deshun Jones
Defendant:
The American Bottling Company
Achs et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Shawn Achs, Chad Purdon, Leah Purdon and others
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Jones v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 4:2024cv10745
Plaintiff:
Sandra Kay Jones
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. USA
as 2:2024cv10738
Petitioner:
Mario Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Macauley
as 1:2024cv10734
Petitioner:
Dexter Carl Jones
Respondent:
People and Matt Macauley
Jones v. FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
CRAIG QUINZEL JONES and KEITH DOUGHERTY
Respondent:
FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
