Cases 31 - 40 of 1,768
Brewster v. Robertson County Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01349
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brewster
Defendant:
Robertson County Tennessee, Robertson County Jail, Sergeant David Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewster v. Robertson County Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01348
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brewster
Defendant:
Robertson County Tennessee, Robertson County Jail, Marshal Gillis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whyte v. Bell et al
as 3:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ricardo Whyte
Defendant:
Brenna K. Bell, Jennings H, Jones, Donna Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Pigeon Forge Police Department
as 3:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Pigeon Forge Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv02752
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Tarvis Jones and Willis White
Jones v. Vantell
as 2:2023cv02748
Petitioner:
Ray Jones and Ray Tarius Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jones v. Loudon County, Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Genny Jones
Defendant:
Loudon County, Tennessee and Officer Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Shelby County Tennessee Government et al
as 2:2023cv02729
Plaintiff:
Davey Floyd
Defendant:
Shelby County Tennessee Government, WellPath, LLC, Reginald Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
