Cases 1 - 10 of 10
GARLAND v. NEWMAN ET AL
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH WAYNE GARLAND
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL, CHRISTINA NEWMAN, SCOTT KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WITHAM v. HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY ALAN WITHAM, JR
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL and SCOTT KANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. KANE
as 1:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
MARK R JORDAN
Respondent:
SCOTT KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KANE v. DHHS
as 2:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC LEO KANE
Defendant:
DHHS
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
POOLE v. HANCOCK COUNTY et al
as 1:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY POOLE
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY, SCOTT KANE, TIMOTHY RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARNEY et al v. HANCOCK COUNTY MAINE et al
as 1:2020cv00349
Defendant:
FRANK L SHEP ARD, AROOSTOOK MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC, KAYLA DUMOND and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERTA E WINCHELL, ESQ and STEW ART CARNEY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. KANE
as 2:2019cv00311
Defendant:
MICHAEL C KANE
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Interested Party:
TOWN AND COUNTRY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
KANE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2008cv00271
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND KANE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
