Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Langley v. Inyo et al
as 1:2016at00606
Plaintiff:
Julia Langley
Defendant:
County Of Inyo and Margaret Kemp-Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01663
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hosea-Criddell v. Metcalf et al
as 2:2015cv00691
Plaintiff:
Edweina Hosea-Criddell
Defendant:
B Metcalf, Unknown Smith, Mesa, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Weiss v. City of Santa Rosa Police Department et al
as 4:2015cv01639
Plaintiff:
Terry L Weiss
Defendant:
City of Santa Rosa Police Department , Tom Schwedhelm , John Deadman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Leon Rosby v. City of Hawthorne et al
as 2:2014cv03036
Defendant:
City of Hawthorne, Does, Shaun Kemp and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Rosby
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-17493
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hilde v. Roosevelt County et al
as 4:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Chad Arnold Hilde
Defendant:
Roosevelt County, City of Poplar, Montana Department of Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keith Judd, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 12-57177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH JUDD, ORLY TAITZ, THOMAS G. MACLERAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, in his capacity as a candidate on the ballot for the US President in 2012 election, NATALIE E. TENNANT, in her capacity of West Virginia Secretary of State, DEBRA BOWEN, in her capacity of California Secretary of State and others
Keith Judd et al v. Barack Obama et al
as 8:2012cv01888
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, John Avlon, Ballot Law Commission of State of New Hampshire and others
Plaintiff:
David Farrar, Keith Judd, Leah Lax and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
