Cases 1 - 10 of 52
USA v. Shamont Sapp
as 22-3093
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAMONT L. SAPP
Sapp v. Wolfinger et al
as 6:2022cv01714
Plaintiff:
Marlon L. Sapp and Marlon Lajuane Sapp
Defendant:
Norman Wolfinger, John Griesbum and Warren Vanvuren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapp v. State of Florida, et al
as 6:2022cv01402
Plaintiff:
Marlon L. Sapp
Defendant:
State of Florida and Norman Wolfinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapp v. Titusville Police Department
as 6:2022cv01301
Plaintiff:
Marlon L. Sapp
Defendant:
Titusville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapp v. Titusville Sheriff Department
as 6:2022cv01286
Plaintiff:
Marlon L. Sapp
Defendant:
Titusville Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapp v. Vanvuren
as 6:2022cv01287
Plaintiff:
Marlon L. Sapp
Defendant:
Warren Vanvuren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapp v. State of Florida
as 6:2022cv01288
Plaintiff:
Marlon L. Sapp
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAILEY v. CREANY et al
as 3:2021cv00040
Defendant:
VINCE MARKEL, RICHARD BECK, FREDERICK CREANY and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Oklahoma City v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and Other Related Pump Station Continuous Extended Term Easements and rights-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Christian Bartholomew Switch, Herbert Joe White, Nancy Gay White Mann and others
Plaintiff:
City of Oklahoma City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Sapp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jodie L. Sapp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
