Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Loza v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as ILS/3:14-cv-00209
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Loza
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. , Organon International Inc. and others
US v. Orlando Loza
as 13-4966
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ORLANDO GONZALEZ LOZA
Hilda Loza v. CBE Group Inc et al
as 5:2013cv02060
Defendant:
CBE Group Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Hilda Loza
In Re: Crude Oil Commodity Fut
as 13-4447
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Stephen E. Ardizzone, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Adam Haber, SMW Trading Co. and others
Appellant:
Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. and Shell Oil Company
Defendant - Appellee:
Parnon Energy, Inc., Arcadia Petroleum Ltd., Arcadia Energy (Suisse) SA and others
Loza v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-18511
Plaintiff:
Maria C. Loza
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Loza v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-18854
Plaintiff:
Maria C. Loza
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. Loza et al
as 2:2013cv00931
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Agustin Loza and Reymundo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Fermin Loza-Jaimes v. Janet Napolitano
as 13-60142
Petitioner:
FERMIN LOZA-JAIMES
Respondent:
JANET NAPOLITANO, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Parker et al v. Lithia Motors, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01326
Plaintiff:
Michael Parker and Rick Zimmerman
Defendant:
Lithia Motors, Inc., Lithia Motors Support Services, Inc., Vincent Armijo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Amado Loza-Azarte
as 12-51264
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AMADO LOZA-AZARTE, also known as Pisto, also known as Amado Loza, also known as Amando Loza-Azarte
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
