Cases 1 - 10 of 114
NIEDBALSKI v. LAPORTE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
as 3:2024cv00162
Defendant:
LAPORTE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
LUCAS A. NIEDBALSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATERFILL v. BLUE ROAD 2020, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
LUCAS WATERFILL
Defendant:
MUESING MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC. and BLUE ROAD 2020, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
MCDANIEL v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
Lucas McDaniel
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00103
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFIN v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00935
Defendant:
DANNY CLARK, THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF FAYETTE COUNTY, FAYETTE COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GRIFFIN, LUCAS WALKER, THOMAS TOMLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LUCAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00891
Petitioner:
DEJUAN LUCAS and DUJUAN LUCAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Niedbalski v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Lucas A. Niedbalski
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail and Ron Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niedbalski v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Lucas A. Niedbalski
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail and Ron Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
