Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Terrell Cordarryl Stanford v. Lt. B. Perez et al
as 2:2023cv08471
Petitioner:
Terrell Cordarryl Stanford
Respondent:
B Perez, J Coleman, B Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanford v. Perez et al
as 3:2023cv04211
Plaintiff:
Terrell Cordarryl Stanford
Defendant:
Lt. B. Perez, J. Coleman, B. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lance Williams v. Navarro, et al
as 22-55974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE ELLIOT WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
NAVARRO, Correction Officer (3rd Watch Control Tower), E. ESTRADA, Correctional Officer, J. MEJIA, Correctional Officer and others
(PC) Young v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Gamboa, Galleger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Young v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv01646
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Gamboa, Galleger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lance Williams v. Navarro, et al
as 22-55426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE ELLIOT WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
NAVARRO, Correction Officer (3rd Watch Control Tower), E. ESTRADA, Correctional Officer, J. MEJIA, Correctional Officer and others
(HC) Rodriguez v. Koenig
as 2:2021cv01417
Petitioner:
Angel M. Rodriguez
Respondent:
Craig Koenig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Uselton v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02141
Defendant:
David Shinn, Centurian Managed Care, E Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
John Stevenson Uselton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Henley v. Burnes, et al.
as 1:2019cv01101
Plaintiff:
Zuri Henley
Defendant:
L. Xiong, Sgt. Burnes and M. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
