Cases 1 - 10 of 39
CUMMINGS v. BIRDSEYE et al
as 1:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID CUMMINGS
Defendant:
SARAH BIRDSEYE, SARA ANDERSON, AJ BUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Merritt v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01367
Plaintiff:
Deborah Merritt
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Merritt v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
James Merritt
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Marino-Merritt v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Valeri Marino-Merritt
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
MERRITT v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00703
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MERRITT
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
McMillian v. Burton et al
as 5:2021cv00346
Plaintiff:
Eric M. McMillian
Defendant:
Officer Burton, B. A. Merritt and City of Raleigh Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Merritt v. Pittman et al
as 5:2021ct03248
Plaintiff:
Robert Merritt
Defendant:
Sgt. Pittman, Lt. Tomson, C/O Walt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritt v. Smith et al
as 5:2021ct03247
Plaintiff:
Robert Merritt
Defendant:
T.C. Smith and J. Riddle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anti-Tranny Political Action Committee et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 7:2020cv00028
Defendant:
Jeff McCracken, County of Orange, James T. Bryan, III and others
Plaintiff:
Napier Sandford Fuller and Anti-Tranny Political Action Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anti-Tranny Political Action Committee et al v. State of North Carolina, et al
as 7:2020cv00029
Defendant:
Jeff McCracken, County of Orange, James T. Bryan, III and others
Plaintiff:
Napier Sandford Fuller and Anti-Tranny Political Action Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
