Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Quinlan H. Motley v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv02998
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Quinlah H. Motley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nolze et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02836
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William Nolze, Stephen Walter Miller, Randy Paul Miltier and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Thomas Noonan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Koon v. Global Telmate et al
as 4:2021cv01499
Plaintiff:
Robert Holland Koon, Robert Koon and Robert H. Koon
Defendant:
M. H. Cunningham, Joseph F. Rice, John Doe Law Firms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2011cv01840
Plaintiff:
Charmaine Smith
Defendant:
M Mitchell, Neil NLN, B A Finnerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2010cv03044
Plaintiff:
Charmaine Smith
Defendant:
M M Mitchell, K Vining, Ballesteg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv03256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Motley Rice LLC V. James M Evangelista
as 2:2008mc00047
Claimant:
Motley Rice LLC
Respondent:
James M Evangelista
Motley Rice LLC et al v. Baldwin & Baldwin LLP
as 2:2007cv01368
Plaintiff:
Motley Rice LLC, Motley Rice LLC, MRRM PA and others
Defendant:
Baldwin & Baldwin LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
