Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Marr v. Sainvelus et al
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Ricky Donovan Marr
Defendant:
Max Robensky Sainvelus and MJS Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Allen v. City of Raleigh Police Department et al
as 5:2021cv00471
Plaintiff:
Wanda Marie Allen
Defendant:
City of Raleigh Police Department and Captian Marr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Green v. Cochran et al
as 5:2016ct03033
Plaintiff:
Dennis David Green
Defendant:
Curtis Cochran and Martha Marr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Major League Baseball et al
as 3:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Owens
Defendant:
Major League Baseball, National Basketball Association, National Football League and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Marr v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. d/b/a Hollister et al
as 5:2014cv00123
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Taylor Marr
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. d/b/a Hollister and J.M. Hollister, LLC d/b/a Hollister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riker, IV et al v. CCC Transportation, LLC, et al
as 7:2014cv00033
Plaintiff:
Charles Marr Riker, IV and Amy Kathleen Riker
Defendant:
CCC Transportation, LLC and PODS Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Poe v. Coran et al
as 2:2012cv00019
Plaintiff:
Richard Keith Poe
Defendant:
FNU Coran, Martha Marr, FNU Crystal and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Green v. Cochran et al
as 2:2011cv00032
Plaintiff:
Dennis David Green
Defendant:
Curtis A. Cochran, Martha Marr and Swain Co. Detention Facility Staff
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Koenig v. Brynn Marr Homes, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00216
Plaintiff:
John Steven Koenig
Defendant:
Brynn Marr Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
