Cases 21 - 30 of 30
United States of America v. $29,435.00 United States Currency
as 1:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$29,435.00 United States Currency
Claimant:
Michael Earl Mays, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $1,000.00 refunded to Mango Creek Properties, Inc. from GBS Partners,Inc. seized on January 28, 2010 et al
as 8:2011cv00372
Defendant:
$1,000.00 refunded to Mango Creek Properties, Inc. from GBS Partners,Inc. seized on January 28, 2010, $1,000.00 seized on December 22, 2009 from Spence Escrow Company from an escrow account holding money for Deshawn Hernandez, $1,445.00 in United States currency delivered to Terry Haddock by Deshawn Hernandez on May 27, 2009 and on July 6, 2009 and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Shannon Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Three Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($3,600.00) More or Less, in United States Currency Seized on May 2, 2011 et al
as 1:2011cv05194
Defendant:
Sixteen U.S. Postal Money Orders valued at Fifteen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($15,500.00) Seized on May 2, 2011 and Three Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($3,600.00) More or Less, in United States Currency Seized on May 2, 2011
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE (1) PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, KNOWN AS CABANA BAYAMESA et al
as 1:2011cv20802
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ONE (1) PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, KNOWN AS CABANA BAYAMESA, ONE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC KNOWN AS PARCEL 95-A-4-D-1, ONE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC KNOWN AS PARCEL 407 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Mason v. Dineen et al
as 1:2011cv00149
Cross Defendant:
John Dineen and Robert Dineen, Jr.
Defendant:
John Dineen, Robert Dineen, Jr. and May Ryan, LLC
Plaintiff:
Joy Mason
Cross Claimant:
May Ryan, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
United States of America v. Funds in the Amount of $32,000 et al
as 1:2011cv00031
Defendant:
Funds in the Amount of $32,000, Funds in the Amount of $8,935.23, Funds in the Amount of $7,575.56 and others
Claimant:
Dao Minh Nguyen, Phuong U Lee, Thai Minh Nguyen and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. $541,395.06 United States Currency et al
as 6:2010cv06555
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$541,395.06 United States Currency, All that Tract or Parcel of Land, together with all its Buildings, Appurtenances, Improvements, Fixtures, Attachments and Easements, as more particularly described in a certain Deed recorded in the On, The Jewelry seized on May 20, 2009 appraised in the amount of approximately One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) United States Currency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $500,000.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, et al.
as 4:2008cv00972
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$500,000.00 in U.S. Currency, $110,000.00 in U.S. Currency , $100,000.00 in U.S. Currency and others
Claimant:
Saving Call LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Rock River Arms, Model LAR-15, 5.56 Caliber, Rifle, Serial No. CM66455 et al
as 6:2008cv01058
Defendant:
Rock River Arms, Model LAR-15, 5.56 Caliber, Rifle, Serial No. CM66455, Norinco, Model MAI-90, 7.62 Caliber Rifle, Serial No. 41774, Smith & Wesson Model 910, 9MM Pistol, Serial No. BDH7543 and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. 11978 Mays Chapel Road, Timonium, Maryland 21093
as 1:2007cv01286
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
11978 Mays Chapel Road, Timonium, Maryland 21093
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
