Cases 31 - 40 of 3,143
Peterson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02056
Petitioner:
Lowell Peterson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Lauren May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Colon v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
Jose Ortez Colon, Jr.
Respondent:
Robert May and Special Assistant Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Paris Production et al
as 1:2024cv01847
Plaintiff:
Charmeen D. Washington
Defendant:
Paris Production, Production Ibiza, MNRK Music Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Greene et al
as 5:2024ct03060
Plaintiff:
Kayie Shaune Wright
Defendant:
E. Greene, S. Fraser, Sergeant Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemke v. Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Lemke and Angel Marie
Defendant:
Beth Skinner, Jerome Greenfield, Nichole Francis and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. TransUnion Credit Bureau et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
TransUnion Credit Bureau and William Bill Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jorge May v. USA
as 24-10608
Petitioner:
JORGE RAMON NEWBALL MAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Franks v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00259
Petitioner:
Jerome Franks
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Portee v. Beary et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Portee
Defendant:
May Beary, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Monnig et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Christopher Louis Harper
Defendant:
Shane Monnig, Timothy Baker, Adam Lemmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
