Cases 1 - 10 of 395
May v. USA
as 4:2023cv01217
Petitioner:
Isaac May
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Herrington v. Thomas et al
as 6:2023cv06134
Plaintiff:
Robert Lane Herrington
Defendant:
Sheriff Neal Thomas, Jail Admin #1 Russ Carmack, Jail Admin #2 Brett Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
May v. Hines et al
as 4:2023cv04094
Plaintiff:
Shawn Allen May
Defendant:
Sergeant Hines, Sergeant Eleely and Sergeant Yeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. May
as 4:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Dottie Anderson
Defendant:
Bobby May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
May v. Jackson
as 4:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Parnell R May
Defendant:
M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mays v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2023cv03011
Plaintiff:
David W Mays
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Perkins v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays and Larry Perkins
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John P Yates, Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John P Yates, Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stafford v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04092
Plaintiff:
Charles Stafford
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
