Cases 11 - 20 of 569
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Morton v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv00818
Plaintiff:
Paris Morton
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, Frederick Hutson doing business as Piqeonly, Las Vegas Metro Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re DMCA 512(h) Subpoena to X Corp.
as 2:2023mc00060
Petitioner:
X Corp. and Genevieve Morton
In Re:
DMCA 512(h) Subpoena to X Corp.
Fannie Mae et al v. Amelia Aid Propco LLC
as 2:2023mc00012
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Amelia Aid Propco LLC, Ashley Aid Propco LLC, Bentley Aid Propco LLC and others
Receiver:
Michael F Flanagan
Morton v. Gaines
as 2:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Paris Morton
Defendant:
Kiseana Gaines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Morton v. Critterden
as 2:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Paris Morton
Defendant:
James E. Critterden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Morton v. Torax Medical, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Arthur F. Morton
Defendant:
Torax Medical, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Contreras v. Robins & Morton Corporation
as 3:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Francisco Contreras, III
Defendant:
Robins & Morton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Eijah Lee Miller v. State of California et al
as 5:2023cv00020
Petitioner:
Ms. Elijah Lee Miller
Respondent:
State of California, San Bernardino County, Maria MI. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
