Cases 1 - 10 of 114
FORD v. MURRAY
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
BILLY EUGENE FORD
Defendant:
JOHN MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutledge v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Terry Donald Rutledge and Terry Rutledge
Defendant:
Brian English, Aaron Smith, Shaun Dwyer and others
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, TRINITY FOOD SERVICES GROUP, H. SOLAJA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSA v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00548
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ROSA, III
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, WHITNEY MOORE, SAMUEL J. BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson, Jr. et al v. Murray et al
as 3:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Kinte J. Johnson, Jr. and Tristan T. Johnson
Defendant:
Dave Murray, Indiana State Police Officer and J Eagen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tuzinski v. Porter County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Nakita Tuzinski, ET and LT
Defendant:
Porter County Sheriffs Department, David Murray, David Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Maksyn et al
as 3:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Edward Williams
Defendant:
Joseph Maksyn, Murray, A Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
Robert L Murray
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURKES v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
JABARI BURKES
Defendant:
MURRAY, KENPP and WEXFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURKES v. MURRAY
as 2:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
JABARI BURKES
Defendant:
MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
