Cases 41 - 50 of 521
Noriega v. Pelletier, et al
as 23-1085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. NORIEGA
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL PELLETIER, M.D., ERIC LOVONAS, M.D. and HOFFMAN, M.D.
Portela Noriega v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00081
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Portela Noriega
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00469
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
(SS)Romero v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Noriega Romero
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
USA v. Cesar Molina Munoz
as 23-50033
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CESAR ORENSO MOLINA MUNOZ, AKA Miguel Alcoba, AKA Cesar Castillo Munoz, AKA Kevin Estuardo Molina, AKA Cezar Orenso Molina Munoz, AKA Cesar Munoz, AKA Kevin Noriega
Noriega v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 7:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Maria Gemila Noriega
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Romero v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023at00064
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Noriega Romero
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
FBCC CityPoint, LP v. City Of Austin et al
as 1:2022cv01272
Plaintiff:
FBCC CityPoint, LP
Defendant:
City Of Austin, Steve Adler, Natasha Harper-Madison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
NORIEGA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25136
Plaintiff:
BOBBY NORIEGA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
