Cases 1 - 10 of 212
Caruthers v. Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department et al
as 7:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
William H. Caruthers
Defendant:
Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department, Officer Perez, Officer Morbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Cruz Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Perez v. Reagle
as 5:2024cv00083
Petitioner:
Oscar Perez
Respondent:
Christina Reagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melendez-Perez v. USP Lee, FBOP
as 7:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Cesar Francis Melendez-Perez
Respondent:
Warden USP Lee, FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jack Jones v. J. Perez
as 23-7231
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK ERIC JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
DETECTIVE J. PEREZ, NEFTAL ARGUELA and DETECTIVE J. CHINCHILLA
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and GLENARDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Gama-Perez v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00340
Petitioner:
Josue Gama-Perez
Respondent:
Acting Warden S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vail-Perez v. USA
as 5:2023cv00545
Petitioner:
Mynor Romeo Vail-Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Oscar Perez v. Troy Morrison
as 23-6928
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OSCAR PEREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
TROY A. MORRISON, Sergeant, Alexander CI
Perez Gonzalez v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02190
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Perez Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
