Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Jones-Williams v. Missouri State et al
as 4:2023cv00947
Defendant:
Beverly Barnett Parker, Missouri State, County of St. Louis and others
Plaintiff:
Rozina Rhonda Jones-Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merlin Williams v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 23-2676
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Mississippi, Muriel B. Ellis, Jim M. Greenlee and others
Randolph v. Buckner
as 4:2023cv00369
Petitioner:
Joshua Randolph
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luke v. Ft. Dodge Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2023cv03019
Plaintiff:
Scott Randolph Luke
Defendant:
Ft. Dodge Correctional Facility, North Central Correctional Facility, Kris Karberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Criswell v. USA
as 4:2023cv00384
Petitioner:
Clifford Randolph Criswell, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Luke v. Iowa
as 3:2023cv03012
Petitioner:
Scott Randolph Luke
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State of Mississippi et al
as 0:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Muriel B. Ellis, Jim M. GreenLee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Otte v. Randolph County
as 23-1024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shawn Otte
Defendant / Appellee:
Randolph County
Meeks v. Peters et al
as 4:2022cv00996
Plaintiff:
Antoine D. Meeks
Defendant:
Jarrod Peters, Randolph County Sheriff's Office, Chris Guisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Otte v. Randolph County
as 2:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Randolph County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
