Cases 21 - 30 of 174
Confusione et al v. Autozoners, LLC
as 2:2021cv00001
Plaintiff:
Keith Confusione and Randolph Brannigan
Defendant:
Autozoners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HEATH v. HARPER'S TREE AND STUMP REMOVAL INC et al
as 1:2020cv00211
Defendant:
HARPER'S TREE AND STUMP REMOVAL INC and DONALD RANDOLPH HARPER
Plaintiff:
DONTAVIOUS HEATH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kinderman v. Auto Systems Centers, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01749
Defendant:
Randolph Katz, Katz Midas Franchisees, Midas Auto and Tire Experts and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Kinderman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Randolph v. The Intersect Group, LLC
as 1:2020cv02826
Plaintiff:
Jamie J. Randolph
Defendant:
The Intersect Group, LLC
TEITELMAN v. QUEUEDR INC. et al
as 1:2020cv01859
Defendant:
PATRICK RANDOLPH and QUEUEDR INC.
Plaintiff:
ADAM TEITELMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randolph v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv20191
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Robyn Randolph
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Mahabir v. Queens Dollar, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv09395
Plaintiff:
Mahabir Mahabir and Randolph Mahabir
Defendant:
Samir Z. Dhanani, Amit Shah, Queens Dollar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WRIGHT v. WASTE PRO USA, INC. et al
as 0:2019cv62051
Defendant:
WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA, INC. and WASTE PRO USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WRIGHT, Randolph Mobley, Shawn Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
KENNINGTON v. HARPER'S TREE AND STUMP REMOVAL INC et al
as 1:2019cv00052
Defendant:
HARPER'S TREE AND STUMP REMOVAL INC and DONALD RANDOLPH HARPER
Plaintiff:
JAMIE KENNINGTON, JUAN URBINA, JR. and DARREN JASKULSKI
Toles v. Ace Hardware Corporation
as 4:2019cv00376
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation
Plaintiff:
Randolph Toles
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
