Cases 11 - 20 of 466
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Robinson v. USA
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Meguel Greylen Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Anderson v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Anderson
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, The Office of the Governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Williams v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024ct03005
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Correctional Officer Gray, Correctional Officer Privis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
Wilmar Robinson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Robinson v. United States of America
as 5:2023hc02251
Petitioner:
Michael Robinson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ROBINSON v. EMS MANAGEMENT & CONSULTANTS, INC.
as 1:2023cv00921
Plaintiff:
EDITH ROBINSON
Defendant:
EMS MANAGEMENT & CONSULTANTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tebib v. Capps et al
as 5:2023ct03288
Plaintiff:
Hamza Tebib
Defendant:
Allison Capps, ADA Brown, Chief James Champion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
