Cases 21 - 30 of 16,848
Bocanegra v. Ross Stores, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Maria Ofelia Bocanegra
Defendant:
Ross Stores, Inc. d/b/a dd's Discounts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McNeel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv11053
Plaintiff:
Ross Edward McNeel
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ross v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01931
Plaintiff:
James Ross
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ross v. USA
as 5:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
Henry Lamar Ross
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Saintillus v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2493
Plaintiff:
CHALONER SAINTILLUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PHILLIP A. TALBERT, GRANT RABENN and others
Ross v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01883
Plaintiff:
William Ross
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Byrd et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00488
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Byrd, Derek Junior Adams, Jeffrey O'Brien Anglim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Starlette Thompson et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
Starlette Thompson and Patrina Holloway
Defendant:
County of Riverside, San Bernardino Dept of Public Social Sevices, Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
In re: Carey Ross
as 24-11227
Petitioner:
In re: CAREY L. ROSS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
