Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Monteyne v. Miller Fabrication LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Keith Monteyne
Defendant:
Miller Fabrication LLC, Dynamic Energy Services, Inc., Natural Energy Field Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ross v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00079
Plaintiff:
Ila G. Ross
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ross v. C.R. Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00046
Plaintiff:
Charles Theodore Ross
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Powers v. Rossco Crane & Rigging, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00101
Plaintiff:
Kevin Powers
Defendant:
Ross Kovach, Rossco Crane & Rigging, Inc. and Jere Kovach
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ross v. Heller Casing Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00352
Defendant:
Heller Casing Service, Inc. and Casey Heller
Plaintiff:
Monty Ross
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Groover v. XTO Energy Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
Brian Groover
Defendant:
XTO Energy Inc., Ross Eriksmoen, Inc. , Petroleum Experience Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Branch v. XTO Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00010
Plaintiff:
Charles Branch
Defendant:
XTO Energy, Inc., Ross Eriksmoen, Inc., Petroleum Experience, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ross v. BAHA Petroleum Consulting Corp.
as 4:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ross
Defendant:
BAHA Petroleum Consulting Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
