Cases 11 - 20 of 1,576
Williams Rowland Acquisition Corp. v. Global Food and Ingredients Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Williams Rowland Acquisition Corp.
Defendant:
Global Food and Ingredients Ltd. and Maxim Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Asherman v. Rowland
as 2:2024cv01732
Plaintiff:
Philip K. Asherman
Defendant:
Thomas C Rowland, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Scott v. Everbridge, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Everbridge, Inc., David Henshall, David Benjamin and others
Finger v. Everbridge, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Defendant:
Everbridge, Inc., David Henshall, David Benjamin and others
Rowland v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Karen Denise Rowland
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Quagliani v. Everbridge, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Ray Quagliani
Defendant:
Everbridge, Inc., David Henshall, David Benjamin and others
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2024cv02382
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Judge Ana Reyes, Judge Christopher Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
David v. Wasatch County Utah et al
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Lynn David
Defendant:
Wasatch County, Utah, Mark Nelson, Spencer Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
