Cases 1 - 10 of 2,183
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Shyla Smith
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS v. SMITH
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
DALVECCIO TREMAINE THOMAS
Defendant:
SERGEANT SMITH, MR. PETRELLI, Lt. T. CHAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA
as 5:2024cv00328
Petitioner:
Nashiem Malik Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Smith v. USA
as 3:2024cv00550
Petitioner:
Dontravis Dominique Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Tora Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ordonez Vega v. Paramore et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Walter H. Paramore, III, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BROOKS v. RICKER et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN A. BROOKS
Defendant:
OFFICER RICKER, OFFICER JONES, OFFICER SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Charlotte NC DEA Federal Narcotic Officers
as 3:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Justice Smith
Defendant:
Charlotte NC DEA Federal Narcotic Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
