Cases 1 - 10 of 45
FAYEMI v. WALTERS et al
as 2:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL O. FAYEMI
Defendant:
RODNEY WALTERS, JOHN R. WALTON, BRAD TOMASELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRINGER et al v. SAFETY TUBS COMPANY, LLC
as 2:2022cv01554
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN SPRINGER and ESTHER SPRINGER
Defendant:
SAFETY TUBS COMPANY, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Richard Malcolm, Malcolm Construction, LLC, RITTENHOUSE PLAZA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
SPRINGER et al v. SHELL PIPELINE COMPANY LP
as 2:2021cv01196
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L SPRINGER and VERONICA S SPRINGER
Defendant:
SHELL PIPELINE COMPANY LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STOLTIE v. COUNTY OF GREENSBURG et al
as 2:2021cv00267
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER DEMOREST, STEVEN M. PELESKY, JEFFERY LONG and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOSEPH STOLTIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NELSON v. LOWTHER et al
as 2:2021cv00114
Defendant:
PAUL DEPALM, GEORGE LOWTHER, BENJAMIN C. SHAFFER and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JONES v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH CENTER et al
as 2:2019cv04216
Plaintiff:
BRIANNA JONES
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH CENTER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY and JOEL SPRINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPRINGER v. CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2019cv00783
Plaintiff:
R.J. SPRINGER
Defendant:
CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Springer v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv01080
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Springer
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
EYAJAN v. STATE OF OHIO et al
as 1:2019cv00161
Defendant:
KIM KOSKI, GERALD L. HEINBAUGH, MARY SPRINGER and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA M. EYAJAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
