Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Williams v. Sloan et al
as 5:2012cv00238
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
D L Sloan, Correctional Medical Services, Charlotte Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Stratton et al
as 5:2010cv00333
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Stratton, Ables, Jimmy Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roddy v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 5:2009cv00229
Plaintiff:
Troy Roddy
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Wendy Kelley, Stratton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner et al v. Douglas et al
as 1:2008cv00026
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Arzel Turner, Catherynne W Kendrick, Francis R Perry and others
Defendant:
Sonya Douglas, S Banker, Judy Steed and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Askew v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2008cv00094
Plaintiff:
Frank W Askew, Jr
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelly, Steven Bischof and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Norris et al
as 5:2008cv00096
Plaintiff:
Kiara A Smith
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stratton v. Mays et al
as 5:2008cv00001
Plaintiff:
Polly Elizabeth Stratton
Defendant:
Larry Mays and John Maples, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stratton v. Maples et al
as 1:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
Polly Stratton
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr, Maggie Capel, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Henderson v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tommy Henderson
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, George Wilson, Tom Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2007cv00186
Plaintiff:
Kiara Smith
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Keni quetrix Strain, Kim Luckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
